Tornado Turnip Minotaur
MFA Thesis Abstract
School of the Art Institute of Chicago
This critical inquiry argues for the efficacy of a “handrail” strategy in navigating experimental fiction, using the author’s hybrid fiction... as a primary case study. This 105,000-word narrative, entitled "A Tornado, a Turnip, and a Minotaur Walk into a Bar: An American Memoir" and completed in April 2025, responds to a challenge faced by many contemporary writers: how to innovate storytelling without sacrificing engagement by readers accustomed to traditional forms. Authors want to keep their readers reading—even while navigating content that some may be perceived as odd, absurd, or disconcerting. To keep a reader’s experience balanced, even in the face of heavily fragmented text passages, the creative development of A Tornado… built a “handrail” with familiar elements. This narrative has clear story arcs with rising action, climax, and resolution, as well as compelling characters with strengths, weaknesses, and intent to attain goals in the face of obstacles. These aspects, however, offer much more than reliance on familiarity; they actively reframe the experimental passages, guiding thematic interpretation. The “handrail” in A Tornado… aligns with thoughts and best practices of scholars and authors working with threads of post-structuralism, reader response theory, literary allusions, recurring motifs, and black studies. Functionally, this type of “handrail strategy” has the capacity to guide readers, whether novice or sophisticated, as they make their way through experimental passages and unlock meaningful statements about fear, social injustice, and identity.
Thesis adviser's feedback